All the AVRs that I've looked at had the same pin/port structure, with
the possible states being input/floating, input/pullup, low, and high
(with the same PORT/DDR registers). The main difference is the number of
available ports and pins. To reduce the amount of code and avoid
duplication (and thus errors) I decided to centralize this, following
the design used by the atmega2560 but while using a trick to save
tracking a few registers.
In the process, I noticed that the Pin.Get() function was incorrect on
the atmega2560 implementation. It is now fixed in the unified code.
This commit changes pin numbering for atmega328 based boards (Uno, Nano)
to use the standard format, where pin number is determined by the
pin/port. Previously, pin numbers were based on what the Uno uses, which
does not seem to have a clear pattern.
One difference is that counting starts at port B, as there is no port A.
So PB0 is 0, PB1 is 1… PC0 is 8.
This commit also moves PWM code to the atmega328 file, as it may not be
generic to all ATmega chips.
Not tested on actual hardware, only on simavr. The main motivation for
adding this chip is to be able to run simulated tests using a much
larger memory space (16kB RAM, 128kB flash) without jumping to the XMega
devices that may not be as well supported by LLVM.