639ec1e6ee
The main change is in building the libraries, where -fshort-enums was passed on RISC-V while other C files weren't compiled with this setting. Note: the test already passed before this change, but it seems like a good idea to explicitly test for enum size consistency. There is also not a particular reason not to pass -fshort-enums on RISC-V. Perhaps it's better to do it there too (on baremetal targets that don't have to worry about binary compatibility).
59 строки
1,1 КиБ
Text
59 строки
1,1 КиБ
Text
fortytwo: 42
|
|
add: 8
|
|
myint: 3 5
|
|
myint size: 2
|
|
longlong: -1099511627776
|
|
global: 3
|
|
defined ints: 5 5
|
|
defined floats: +5.800000e+000 +5.800000e+000
|
|
defined string: defined string
|
|
defined char: 99
|
|
15: 15
|
|
25: 25
|
|
callback 1: 50
|
|
callback 2: 600
|
|
bool: true true
|
|
float: +3.100000e+000
|
|
double: +3.200000e+000
|
|
complex float: (+4.100000e+000+3.300000e+000i)
|
|
complex double: (+4.200000e+000+3.400000e+000i)
|
|
complex long double: (+4.300000e+000+3.500000e+000i)
|
|
char match: true
|
|
void* match: true true true
|
|
int64_t match: true
|
|
struct: true 256 -123456 +3.140000e+000
|
|
array: 5 6 7
|
|
union: true
|
|
union s: 22
|
|
union f: +3.140000e+000
|
|
union global data: 5 8 1
|
|
union local data: 5 8 1
|
|
union s: true
|
|
union f: +6.280000e+000
|
|
union field: +6.280000e+000
|
|
bitfield a: 15
|
|
bitfield b: 1
|
|
bitfield c: 2
|
|
bitfield d: 47
|
|
bitfield e: 5
|
|
bitfield a: 7
|
|
bitfield b: 0
|
|
bitfield c: 3
|
|
bitfield d: 47
|
|
bitfield e: 5
|
|
struct: 3 5
|
|
n in chain: 3
|
|
n in chain: 6
|
|
n in chain: 7
|
|
option: 12
|
|
option A: 0
|
|
option B: 1
|
|
option C: -5
|
|
option D: -4
|
|
option E: 10
|
|
option F: 11
|
|
option G: 12
|
|
option 2A: 20
|
|
option 3A: 21
|
|
enum width matches: true
|
|
copied string: foobar
|