dumb -> leaking:
make it more clear what this "GC" does: leak everything.
marksweep -> conservative:
"marksweep" is too generic, use "conservative" to differentiate
between future garbage collectors: precise marksweep / mark-compact /
refcounting.
Instead of trying to modify periperhals directly, external functions are
called. For example, __tinygo_gpio_set sets a GPIO pin to a specified
value (high or low). It is expected that binaries made this way will be
linked with some extra libraries that implement support for these
functions.
One particularly interesting case is this experimental board simulator:
https://github.com/aykevl/tinygo-play
Compiling code to WebAssembly with the correct build tag for a board
will enable this board to be simulated in the browser.
Atmel/Microchip based SAMD boards are not currently supported, because
their I2C/SPI support is somewhat uncommon and harder to support in the
machine API. They may require a modification to the machine API for
proper support.
This change results in changes to all smoketests for Cortex-M based
chips: they get a bit smaller (32-48 bytes). I'm not sure why but
probably because the inliner made a different inlining decision. There
was a similar effect when files generated from SVD files switched to the
new volatile types so it's probably harmless.
strings.IndexByte was implemented in the runtime up to Go 1.11. It is
implemented using a direct call to internal/bytealg.IndexByte since Go
1.12.
Make sure we remain compatible with both.
This is very useful for debugging. It differentiates between a stack
overflow and other errors (because it's easy to see when a stack
overflow occurs) and prints the old stack pointer and program counter if
available.
Instead of storing the value to send/receive in the coroutine promise,
store only a pointer in the promise. This simplifies the code a lot and
allows larger value sizes to be sent across a channel.
Unfortunately, this new system has a code size impact. For example,
compiling testdata/channel.go for the BBC micro:bit, there is an
increase in code size from 4776 bytes to 4856 bytes. However, the
improved flexibility and simplicity of the code should be worth it. If
this becomes an issue, we can always refactor the code at a later time.
This is implemented as follows:
* The parent coroutine allocates space for the return value in its
frame and stores a pointer to this frame in the parent coroutine
handle.
* The child coroutine obtains the alloca from its parent using the
parent coroutine handle. It then stores the result value there.
* The parent value reads the data from the alloca on resumption.
The generated wasm is 575 bytes when compiled with -no-debug (and
works), which is a much better first experience for new users than
the 20KB+ added (atm) just from including fmt.
Adds another example showing the simple case
of executing main, adds a README explaining how
everything fits together and how to execute the compiled
code in the browser. Include a minimal webserver for
local testing.
